Youth Participation in Development

A Guide for Development Agencies and Policy Makers
  • Home
  • Introduction
  • Part 1: rationale
  • Part 2: strategies & case studies
  • part 3: mainstreaming
  • Appendices

Contents

  • The Guide
    • Foreword
    • Introduction
    • Part One
    • Part Two
    • Part Three
      • Quality standards
      • Organisational development standards and strategies
      • Policy and planning standards and strategies
      • Implementation standards and strategies
      • Monitoring and evaluation standards and strategies
      • Replicating the case studies
      • Youth Audit
      • Mainstreaming youth within country planning
      • Feedback mechanisms
    • Conclusion
    • Appendices

Supported by

A project of the DFID | CSO Youth Working Group

DFID CSO Youth Working Group

(@ywguk on Twitter)

Hosted and co-ordinated by Restless Development

Restless Development

Funded by The United Kingdom Department for International Development.

Funded the the UK Department for International Development

Home » The Guide » Part Three

Replicating the case studies: questions to consider

Now that you are familiar with the case studies and their associated approaches (in Part Two), and their associated standards and strategies (in Part Three), it is important to consider the following questions before getting started:

  • Are the problems addressed and the objectives relevant to a donor agency/government and specific to the national and local context?
  • Key questions to ask of the local context include:
    • Which youth are excluded?
    • Does current policy and practice treat them as beneficiaries, partners or leaders?
    • What potential opportunities are there from beneficiary to partner? From partner to leader?
    • For each lens, which approach is appropriate to these young people’s evolving capacities, fundamental interests and human rights?
  • How can the process be adapted to suit existing country-level partnerships?
  • Would such an intervention necessitate new partnerships?
  • To what extent did the initiative satisfy the standards for youth as beneficiaries, partners and leaders?
  • Was the scale appropriate?
  • Was there a suitable ratio of partners/leaders to beneficiaries?
  • If young people featured only as beneficiaries, what could have been done (or should be done in the future) to promote them to the level of partners or leaders?
Photo © Students Partnership Worldwide
In this section
‹ Previous page (Monitoring and evaluation standards and strategies) Next page (Youth Audit) ›
  • Printer-friendly version

Search

Text Size

  • Increase
  • Decrease
  • Normal

Current Size: 100%

Download

Download a PDF copy of the Youth Participation in Development guide.

Glossary

Unsure of an acronymn or key term? You can check for definitions in our handy glossary.

Your feedback counts

Have you been using the guide? We want to hear from you.

Got questions? You can get in touch through our contact form.

Project Videos

Learning from Uganda
See video
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››

Project blog

Throughout the creation of this guide we were keeping a record of the project through the 'Youth Guidance Project Blog'. The blog acts as a companion to this online guide, giving you access to further resources and insights into it's creation. 

ShareThis

ShareThis

© SPW/ DFID-CSO Youth Working Group 2010

The text in this document (excluding agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must also be acknowledged as SPW/ DFID-CSO Youth Working Group copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.

For any further questions please write to: Students Partnership Worldwide, Faith House, 7 Tufton Street, London SW1P 3QB UK

Fervens Drupal theme by Leow Kah Thong.