Youth Participation in Development

A Guide for Development Agencies and Policy Makers
  • Home
  • Introduction
  • Part 1: rationale
  • Part 2: strategies & case studies
  • part 3: mainstreaming
  • Appendices

Contents

  • The Guide
    • Foreword
    • Introduction
    • Part One
    • Part Two
      • What emerges from the case studies?
      • Lessons learned from the case studies
      • Organisational Development
      • Policy and planning
      • Implementation
        • Entry points
        • Overcoming the barriers
        • 11. Displaced youth – livelihoods and alternative education (WRC)
        • 12. Employment Fund, Nepal (DFID/SDC)
        • 13. Mainstreaming SRHR in Education (USAID, Senegal)
        • 14. SRHR Peer Education (NAC, Uganda)
        • 15. Educating New Voters, (Finnish Embassy, Nepal)
        • 16. Participatory Budgeting (GTZ, Argentina)
        • 17. Launching a Youth-Led Partner (USAID, Jamaica)
      • Monitoring and evaluation
    • Part Three
    • Conclusion
    • Appendices

Supported by

A project of the DFID | CSO Youth Working Group

DFID CSO Youth Working Group

(@ywguk on Twitter)

Hosted and co-ordinated by Restless Development

Restless Development

Funded by The United Kingdom Department for International Development.

Funded the the UK Department for International Development

Home » The Guide » Part Two » Implementation

12. Employment Fund, Nepal (DFID/SDC)

“It is clear that any proposed solutions to the youth employment challenge which do not take on board the expectations, frustrations and aspirations of young people in relation to the labour market will struggle to meet the needs of youth.” Youth Employment Network 2007

Funded by DFID and SDC, Helvetas Nepal’s employment fund provides skill training to economically poor and socially discriminated out-of-school youth. Private service providers help identify the market potential as well as train participants. The payment to the service providers is based on the type of category trained and linked to outcomes: the service provider does not get any payment for those trainees who do not achieve employment.

Problems addressed

  • Youth are an economic asset and their capacity needs to be tapped for national growth.
  • While 300,000 young people enter the labour market every year, only 50,000 are receiving skills training and according to the 2008 National Labour Force Survey, 46% of 20 to 24 year- olds are “highly underutilised.”

Objectives

  • To provide skill training to poor and socially discriminated out-of-school youth (18 to 35 years) and ensure their gainful employment;
  • To promote decent work;
  • To address the employment needs of youth in order to mitigate social and political instability;
  • To address the particular needs of conflict-affected youth (IDPs, ex- combatants), widows, and the disabled.

Youth as beneficiaries

Fourteen thousand five hundred young people (18 to 35 years), 57% female, received vocational training and support, credit linkage and life skills. N.B., a partner approach can be taken by recruiting outstanding trainees to train others and review project design.

Process

  • Timeframe: 12 months; three months training plus follow up.
  • Private service providers (currently 17, in 38 districts) are selected based on a competitive bidding system.
  • A rapid market appraisal is carried out to identify local market need by the service provider.
  • Target groups categorised (by gender, caste etc).
  • Implementation of training. Mobile trainings for geographically isolated youth groups.
  • Post-training support includes market linkage, business counselling and knowledge on labour rights and credit linkage.
  • Differential pricing mechanism (see below) ensures that youth from disadvantaged groups are reached.
  • Payment to service provider is based on outcomes. The first payment is made after submission of training completion report (40% of the outcome cost), second payment after submitting income verification report at three month of working (25%) and the remaining 35% after completion of income verification at six months of training.

Results
  • Training schemes using this model can be highly effective. The trainees’ pass rate (as recorded by the National Skill Testing Board) was 80% in 2009.
  • Similarly the employment rate was very high post-training at 92%.
  • A wide range of training areas have been developed. Trainees working in 49 trades in 2009 included construction, welding, furniture making, embroidery, plumbing, and electricians.

Lessons learned
  • Mobile trainings (trainers travelling to trainees) are helpful and cost-effective in reaching out in geographically isolated regions.
  • Differentiated pricing mechanism helps deliver training to the targeted groups more effectively.
  • Outcome-based and post financing model has helped to ensure that the fund is utilised as per mandates.

Potential challenges
  • Geographic remoteness makes it difficult for service providers to identify employable trades in those areas that would help the people to generate minimum income of USD$3000/month after the skills training.
  • Skills training sometimes did not match the interest and need of the employers.
  • Post-training support like linkage to the collateral-free loan and market linkage needs to be strengthened.
  • The service providers in the market are mostly output oriented rather than outcome oriented.
  • Tracing of the graduates for income reporting, especially those going to India and overseas, is challenging as the graduates change their working place frequently and service providers are not notified.

For further information contact:
http://www.helvetasnepal.org.np/

Young people are eager to learn and engage - Photo © Panos
Additional Resources: 

1) The Helvetas RMA concept note_Draft_ CKA 09

2) Shared Learning Network in Nepal. Read the report here: http://bit.ly/c2Z4Xf   

3) Get Youth On Board Toolkit on Youth Employment (GTZ, 2008): http://bit.ly/cl3zGR

4) International Alert – governance, youth unemployment and post conflict: http://bit.ly/cAzd5k

Themes: Post-Conflict Transition and Livelihoods
Youth Engagement Lens: Beneficiaries
Operational Area: Implementation
In this section
‹ Previous page (11. Displaced youth – livelihoods and alternative education (WRC)) Next page (13. Mainstreaming SRHR in Education (USAID, Senegal)) ›
  • Printer-friendly version

Search

Text Size

  • Increase
  • Decrease
  • Normal

Current Size: 100%

Download

Download a PDF copy of the Youth Participation in Development guide.

Glossary

Unsure of an acronymn or key term? You can check for definitions in our handy glossary.

Your feedback counts

Have you been using the guide? We want to hear from you.

Got questions? You can get in touch through our contact form.

Project Videos

Learning from Uganda
See video
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››

Project blog

Throughout the creation of this guide we were keeping a record of the project through the 'Youth Guidance Project Blog'. The blog acts as a companion to this online guide, giving you access to further resources and insights into it's creation. 

ShareThis

ShareThis

© SPW/ DFID-CSO Youth Working Group 2010

The text in this document (excluding agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must also be acknowledged as SPW/ DFID-CSO Youth Working Group copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.

For any further questions please write to: Students Partnership Worldwide, Faith House, 7 Tufton Street, London SW1P 3QB UK

Fervens Drupal theme by Leow Kah Thong.